Angel of mine
Benjamin strikes an angelic pose!4 total reviews
Comment from pmsmay2000
Two blurry. This could have been a most perfect picture if it was clear. Your baby is so angelic. It's a real shame that it came out so fractured. Being a photograph non-digital, you should have had a clearer picture.
   |
Two blurry. This could have been a most perfect picture if it was clear. Your baby is so angelic. It's a real shame that it came out so fractured. Being a photograph non-digital, you should have had a clearer picture.
Comment Written 25-May-2004
Comment from Sysop912
buglet1984, this looks as if it may be a lovely image, but it is very difficult to see clearly with your currently displayed image. You've saved this at 9kb out of the 50kb allowable for this site. I would suggest experimenting with your scanning or image editing software, and play around until you can find a happy medium that will deliver a nice quality image at about 50 kilobytes.
Check out the link for Scanning Basics from tech TV at http://www.techtv.com/callforhelp/answerstips/story/0,24330,3626030,00.html
(copy and paste everything from the beginning of "http://" through to the end if "html" into the address bar of your browser, to go there and see the article. Once you've got a high quality scan, work on reducing it for web quality after you make the adjustments you think are required. There are a lot more scanning tutorials out there, find what you need, and take away what's helpful. Not only will you have better representations of your film based images for display online, but a good digital backup should anything happen to your originals.
Hope this is helpful.
Brian
|
buglet1984, this looks as if it may be a lovely image, but it is very difficult to see clearly with your currently displayed image. You've saved this at 9kb out of the 50kb allowable for this site. I would suggest experimenting with your scanning or image editing software, and play around until you can find a happy medium that will deliver a nice quality image at about 50 kilobytes.
Check out the link for Scanning Basics from tech TV at http://www.techtv.com/callforhelp/answerstips/story/0,24330,3626030,00.html
(copy and paste everything from the beginning of "http://" through to the end if "html" into the address bar of your browser, to go there and see the article. Once you've got a high quality scan, work on reducing it for web quality after you make the adjustments you think are required. There are a lot more scanning tutorials out there, find what you need, and take away what's helpful. Not only will you have better representations of your film based images for display online, but a good digital backup should anything happen to your originals.
Hope this is helpful.
Brian
Comment Written 21-May-2004
Comment from Casteel
This would be the absolute sweetest portrait going if the detail could be made outa little clearer. the top of the babies head seems to be a little to dark, and the white seems to be a little over exposed but it is hard to tell. But the angle and the way it was cropped is perfect good job.
|
This would be the absolute sweetest portrait going if the detail could be made outa little clearer. the top of the babies head seems to be a little to dark, and the white seems to be a little over exposed but it is hard to tell. But the angle and the way it was cropped is perfect good job.
Comment Written 21-May-2004
Comment from Richard
The shot is so fuzzy it is hard to make out the details. But it still looks like a sweet shot. I look forward to seeing more of your work. You might wnat to repost the picture
|
The shot is so fuzzy it is hard to make out the details. But it still looks like a sweet shot. I look forward to seeing more of your work. You might wnat to repost the picture
Comment Written 21-May-2004