Dohany street Synagogue
Budapest great Synagogue55 total reviews
Comment from stanjo
I like the angle of the shot I think I would have stepped back a bit to get the other tower in the whole way, good focus and lighting, good story telling ability, thanks for sharing!!
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
    |
I like the angle of the shot I think I would have stepped back a bit to get the other tower in the whole way, good focus and lighting, good story telling ability, thanks for sharing!!
Comment Written 22-Nov-2010
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
-
Thank you very much
Comment from Terri08
# Initial impact=5
# Creativity of presentation=5
# Color Harmony=5
# Center of Interest=5
# Technical Excellence=5
# Technique=5
# Story Telling Ability=5
# Lighting=5
Very nice composition! The colors are great, as well the lighting and sky background. Focus is spot on and love the details in this awesome Synagogue!
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
|
# Initial impact=5
# Creativity of presentation=5
# Color Harmony=5
# Center of Interest=5
# Technical Excellence=5
# Technique=5
# Story Telling Ability=5
# Lighting=5
Very nice composition! The colors are great, as well the lighting and sky background. Focus is spot on and love the details in this awesome Synagogue!
Comment Written 22-Nov-2010
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
-
Thank you very much
-
Your very welcome!
Comment from Mama336
This is a beautiful building and it really stands out against the cloudy sky. I like the clarity and focus in your photo.
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
|
This is a beautiful building and it really stands out against the cloudy sky. I like the clarity and focus in your photo.
Comment Written 22-Nov-2010
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
-
Thank you very much
Comment from RevDon
Initial impact what a wonderful building. Lighting is good, bright sky. Structure presentation. Color harmony is good. Center of interest the twin towers. Cropping is good, I would usually like to have had both complete towers showing. Focus is good. Depth of field not in effect here. Story telling is in the artist's notes and title.
This picture has had some major resturation done to it. There were some wire that draped across the building. I have had very little good luck with the healing tool near other objects. What I find works best is to take the clone tool first along the building. Make the clean cut on both ends of the wire. Then if you want you an use the healing bush, but most of the time I continue to use the clone tool like the healing tool.
I collect pictures of just plan no clutter skies. I take them with clouds shot from many different directions. When such a situation come up I remove the sky out of the photo and add a lay with the new sky. Once finished and are happy with it, flatten the shot because you can't go back.
Good effort in what you were attempting to do. But it is pretty obvious.
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
 |
Initial impact what a wonderful building. Lighting is good, bright sky. Structure presentation. Color harmony is good. Center of interest the twin towers. Cropping is good, I would usually like to have had both complete towers showing. Focus is good. Depth of field not in effect here. Story telling is in the artist's notes and title.
This picture has had some major resturation done to it. There were some wire that draped across the building. I have had very little good luck with the healing tool near other objects. What I find works best is to take the clone tool first along the building. Make the clean cut on both ends of the wire. Then if you want you an use the healing bush, but most of the time I continue to use the clone tool like the healing tool.
I collect pictures of just plan no clutter skies. I take them with clouds shot from many different directions. When such a situation come up I remove the sky out of the photo and add a lay with the new sky. Once finished and are happy with it, flatten the shot because you can't go back.
Good effort in what you were attempting to do. But it is pretty obvious.
Comment Written 22-Nov-2010
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
-
Thank you very much
Comment from dodgement
To review this I have looked for:
Initial Impact.
Texture.
Lighting.
Technique.
Framing.
Light & Shading.
Story Telling.
Colours.
Difficulty of shot.
In my estimation, I believe this to be a 4.5 star rating. The trees are in the way. Better shot would be the entrance.Personally I think this is a monstrosity compared with your liittle 10 seater. 5 Mil wasted I say.
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
|
To review this I have looked for:
Initial Impact.
Texture.
Lighting.
Technique.
Framing.
Light & Shading.
Story Telling.
Colours.
Difficulty of shot.
In my estimation, I believe this to be a 4.5 star rating. The trees are in the way. Better shot would be the entrance.Personally I think this is a monstrosity compared with your liittle 10 seater. 5 Mil wasted I say.
Comment Written 22-Nov-2010
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
-
Thank you very much
Comment from Polly Brown
This is an elaborate looking building. Good detail in the brickwork.
Good notes. It's a huge place. How sad they find it necessary to segregate the men and women.
Shame you had an overcast day for this photograph.
I think I would have cloned out the security camera in the front.
Thank you.
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
|
This is an elaborate looking building. Good detail in the brickwork.
Good notes. It's a huge place. How sad they find it necessary to segregate the men and women.
Shame you had an overcast day for this photograph.
I think I would have cloned out the security camera in the front.
Thank you.
Comment Written 22-Nov-2010
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
-
Thank you very much
Comment from Echo7
Compositions nice. Beautiful building. Good colours. detail is good. However its slightly out of focus. Top of spires missing. Wouldve been nice to see both tops as they are the most attractive feature along with patterned brickwork. Clonings not been finished. Very obvious. I dont know if its just me but the skys very blotchy.
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
|
Compositions nice. Beautiful building. Good colours. detail is good. However its slightly out of focus. Top of spires missing. Wouldve been nice to see both tops as they are the most attractive feature along with patterned brickwork. Clonings not been finished. Very obvious. I dont know if its just me but the skys very blotchy.
Comment Written 22-Nov-2010
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
-
Thank you very much
Comment from wickedqueenofmean1
The line of this building are lovely with lots of detail coming through in your photo. The color is nice , framing nice. However the sky looks a little oddly shaded.
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
|
The line of this building are lovely with lots of detail coming through in your photo. The color is nice , framing nice. However the sky looks a little oddly shaded.
Comment Written 22-Nov-2010
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
-
Thank you very much
Comment from Lynnwildbrit
Just wonderful, you have captured this so well
Like all the colours and shapes
Thanks for sharing the story
How well traveled you are.
Good focus
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
|
Just wonderful, you have captured this so well
Like all the colours and shapes
Thanks for sharing the story
How well traveled you are.
Good focus
Comment Written 22-Nov-2010
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
-
Thank you very much
Comment from R. Eugene Wallace
This is a very nice building and the photograph is pretty well done. But what have you done to the sky. It's all blotches and the spires look like they have been dodged and it's very distracting. Also is there more to the image at the top? The spire at the top of the left is cut off and are they part of the building or some kind of communication device. If they are not necessary then take them out but this needs to have been cropped better. It's the little details that grab your eye and take the attention away from an otherwise great photo. Retouching needs to be believable and not obvious or it should have been left alone. There are masking techniques that might have solved your problem better. Thanks for sharing.
This rating does not count towards story rating or author rank.
The highest and the lowest rating are not included in calculations.
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
|
This is a very nice building and the photograph is pretty well done. But what have you done to the sky. It's all blotches and the spires look like they have been dodged and it's very distracting. Also is there more to the image at the top? The spire at the top of the left is cut off and are they part of the building or some kind of communication device. If they are not necessary then take them out but this needs to have been cropped better. It's the little details that grab your eye and take the attention away from an otherwise great photo. Retouching needs to be believable and not obvious or it should have been left alone. There are masking techniques that might have solved your problem better. Thanks for sharing.
This rating does not count towards story rating or author rank.
The highest and the lowest rating are not included in calculations.
Comment Written 22-Nov-2010
reply by the author on 22-Nov-2010
-
Thank you very much